

A US district court has ruled that Cognizant is guilty of discriminatory practices against non-Indian employees, following a class-action lawsuit filed by former workers. The court found that the company’s actions warranted punitive damages, as the plaintiffs, including Christy Palmer and Jean-Claude Franchitti, reported being excluded from discussions, facing a hostile work environment, and being replaced by less-qualified Indian workers. Cognizant denies the allegations and plans to appeal, asserting its commitment to equal employment opportunities and a diverse workplace.


A US district court has ruled that Cognizant is guilty of discriminatory practices against non-Indian employees, following a class-action lawsuit filed by former workers. The court found that the company’s actions warranted punitive damages, as the plaintiffs, including Christy Palmer and Jean-Claude Franchitti, reported being excluded from discussions, facing a hostile work environment, and being replaced by less-qualified Indian workers. Cognizant denies the allegations and plans to appeal, asserting its commitment to equal employment opportunities and a diverse workplace.
•Ruling based on a classaction lawsuit from former workers.
•Plaintiffs allege exclusion from discussions and a hostile work environment.
•Claims of being replaced by lessqualified Indian workers.
•Cognizant denies allegations and plans to appeal the decision.
Need any assistance with your queries?
Our AI chatbot support is always available to provide answers to any questions but to begin with, here are some of our most asked questions
What was the ruling against Cognizant?
Who filed the complaint against Cognizant?
What does Cognizant plan to do following the court's decision?







