

AI models like ChatGPT and Gemini are challenging to review due to their rapid updates, broad capabilities, and opaque nature. Despite the difficulties, it's crucial to evaluate them to provide a real-world counterbalance to industry hype. TechCrunch's approach involves qualitative analysis, testing various prompts to gauge the models' capabilities, and sharing subjective judgments. The review process aims to offer insights beyond traditional benchmarks and provide a more nuanced understanding of AI models.


AI models like ChatGPT and Gemini are challenging to review due to their rapid updates, broad capabilities, and opaque nature. Despite the difficulties, it's crucial to evaluate them to provide a real-world counterbalance to industry hype. TechCrunch's approach involves qualitative analysis, testing various prompts to gauge the models' capabilities, and sharing subjective judgments. The review process aims to offer insights beyond traditional benchmarks and provide a more nuanced understanding of AI models.
•TechCrunch emphasizes the importance of evaluating AI models to counter industry hype.
•Their approach involves qualitative analysis, testing various prompts, and sharing subjective judgments.
•The review process aims to offer insights beyond traditional benchmarks for a nuanced understanding of AI models.
Need any assistance with your queries?
Our AI chatbot support is always available to provide answers to any questions but to begin with, here are some of our most asked questions
Why is it challenging to comprehensively review AI models like ChatGPT and Gemini?
How does TechCrunch approach the evaluation of AI models?
Why is it important to evaluate AI models despite the complexities involved?







